Rally Turnout Underscores Majority View
Judging by the overwhelming turnout at the pro-CWB rally in Winnipeg Oct. 28, it is apparent that the plebiscite results of 62 per cent consensus on one issue is quite accurate.
Money raised for the legal challenges was three times more than expected and the largest donations are still coming from the youngest large farmers. Makes sense, if you spend some time thinking. They will lose the most for the longest.
This 62 per cent represents nearly double the Harper majority support of only 39 per cent on dozens of known Conservative platform planks, none of which outlined were anything to do with the CWB issue. In fact during the campaign of 2011 this government emphatically stated the contrary; that farmers would democratically have their say is what is on record. This was the expectation. This was not supposed to be a bait-and-switch scenario.
Deal With It
The government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper has the right to amend legislation. As the present legislation exists however, it has an obligation, a duty, and a responsibility to deal with it first. This must be carried out appropriately and according to the laws of our country. To do otherwise, democracy in Canada will have shamefully become morphed into a state of tyranny.
Board Guilty Of Ideological Bullying
Today, (Oct. 26), I made the very difficult decision to resign effective immediately as the director of District 1 of the Canadian Wheat Board. In a letter to CWB chairman Allen Oberg, I expressed my deep regret in coming to the realization that I can no longer serve my constituents and western Canadian grain farmers in general from within the organization.
Driven by a lifetime of commitment and passion for agriculture, I sought a directorship with the CWB because I wanted to bring about change for the benefit of farmers. I fully understood the CWB s mandate and tried to improve its programs and services to farmers under that mandate. I saw many opportunities to provide farmers more freedom, flexibility and transparency, however, was in many cases treated as though my ideas would cause the destruction of the organization.
During my terms as director, I saw the decisions of many directors driven by hard-line ideology rather than business acumen. When those directors continually used pool account money to justify and support their views for a single desk, I found this ideological bullying unacceptable.
The CWB s decision this week to launch a legal challenge against the federal government over the proposed changes to the CWB Act, when it is clear to everyone that it will not change the outcome and would not change the timing of the government action, is simply wrong.
A previous decision to suspend a director for simply expressing his opinion about the August information meeting is simply wrong. And the decision to allow a motion on the table to change the bylaw requiring a two-thirds majority to remove a director is simply wrong. Such decisions and other discussions that have taken place around the CWB table are not about doing what is best for commercial farmers they are the decisions taken by ideological bullies.
What is happening at the CWB today is, in a word, wrong. To continue to work within the existing dysfunctional CWB board would be a disservice to those who voted for me as their director. It would also be a disservice to all the farmers who want change and an option of using a voluntary CWB.
Furthermore, at this time protecting the single desk at all costs, is in my view, destroying future opportunities, harming the reputation of the farmers, demoralizing staff and creating uncertainty with customers and the industry, all of which will cost farmers money.
I believe the government s efforts to change the CWB are in the best interests of western Canadian grain producers and I will support their efforts and the efforts of other organizations and individuals committed to bring about positive change for western Canadian farmers.
We welcome readers comments on issues that have been covered in the Manitoba Co-operator.In most cases we cannot accept open letters or copies of letters which have been sent to several publications. Letters are subject to editing for length or taste. We suggest a maximum of about 300 words.
Please forward letters to ManitobaCo-operator, 1666DublinAve.,Winnipeg, R3H0H1 or Fax:204-954-1422 or email: [email protected] (subject: To the editor)