More farm groups pan CTA review panel report

It’s thumbs down from the NFU, SaskWheat, SaskBarley and APAS

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: March 10, 2016

The National Farmers Union (NFU), and a coalition of Saskatchewan farm groups, are disappointed with a report prepared by the panel that reviewed the Canadian Transportation Act.

“The CTA review was carried out by the previous government’s appointees, and its results predictably reflect an alignment with CN, CP and the multinational grain companies regarding grain transportation, contrary to the interests of farmers,” NFU president Jan Slomp said in a news release March 1. “Our current government is not required to adopt any of the CTA review’s recommendations. However, it does need to ensure the railways carry out their statutory common carrier obligations, which are a critical part of the Canadian rail system.”

Read Also

The Port of Churchill as seen in 2018. The port and surrounding railway have since been the subject of significant investment for improvement. The Port of Churchill as seen in 2018. The port and surrounding railway have since been the subject of significant investment for improvement. Photo: John Woods/The Canadian Press via ZUMA Press/Reuters

Making way for Port of Churchill expansion

Rail car limits, climate research and marine planning will determine if the Port of Churchill actually can grow beyond its four-month shipping season into year-round trade.

The NFU is urging the government to retain the Maximum Revenue Entitlement (MRE) and review the railways’ costs for shipping grain.

A coalition made up of the Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission, Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission and the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan (APAS), says the report is flawed.

“This report shows a complete disregard and lack of understanding of the financial implications for farmers and the harm these recommendations would cause to provincial economies,” SaskWheat chair Bill Gehl said in a coalition news release.

The report’s recommendations show farmers weren’t listened to, said SaskBarley chair Jason Skotheim.

“Producers are willing to pay their share for rail service, but will suffer significant economic and structural damage if they are subject to uncontrolled railway rate pricing. It is critical we get this right and that the new government listens to producers before making any decisions,” he said.

The Liberals promised a rail costing review during the election and should follow through, added APAS president Norm Hall.

 

About the author

Allan Dawson

Allan Dawson

Contributor

Allan Dawson is a past reporter with the Manitoba Co-operator based near Miami, Man. He has been covering agricultural issues since 1980.

explore

Stories from our other publications