Disjointed Federal Policies Harm Pork Industry

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Published: August 27, 2009

,

Researchers with the George Morris Centre say the federal government’s ongoing support for the ethanol industry undercuts its support for the troubled Canadian hog industry.

In a report critical of the federal government’s assistance plan for the hog sector, authors Al Mussell and Ted Bilyea say the government does not acknowledge the policy failures that will only sow the seeds of future challenges and additional requests for support. Policies for red meat are not well co-ordinated with those for biofuel or management of trade with the U. S., they said.

Read Also

Under the direction of Heather White, Soils at Guelph, far left, Ontario Senator Rob Black, centre, and Yukon Senator Pat Duncan, right, compare the integrity of two soil samples gently laid in mesh baskets to see which will hold its form and which will crumble in long tubes of still water. Photo: Diana Martin

MFGA praises federal government’s national soil strategy promise

Ottawa has announced plans to develop a national agricultural soil health strategy, drawing praise from Manitoba farm organizations.

Providing assistance to the pork segment while supporting ethanol production from grain is disingenuous to hog producers because of the feed grain price environment it creates in Canada. “The ultimate basis of our livestock feeding and red meat segments is competitively priced feed grains,” says Mussell. “Consistency demands that if we help the pork segment recover, we must halt expansion in subsidized grain-based ethanol production, which inflates the relative price of feed grains in Canada and makes livestock feeding uncompetitive here.”

The report, Opening the Throttle and Applying the Brakes: The Disconnected Policy to Support (Stifle) the Canadian Pork Sector, is available on the George Morris Centre website: www.georgemorris.org.

explore

Stories from our other publications