Glacier FarmMedia – There are many options when choosing a loose sow housing system and the decision mostly depends on hog farmers’ confidence in husbandry and technology.
Canadian hog farmers are gradually moving toward loose housing for gestating sows, but debate continues over which system is best.
Why it matters: Making decisions on which sow housing system to use will have implications for years on farm management.
Read Also
Manitoba gets first hand look at ‘trace in-trace out’ protocols in TB investigation
Manitoba livestock producers are watching the trace in trace out protocol in action following a positive test for bovine tuberculosis at dairy operation.
Matt Davis has tried most of the options – shoulder stalls, electronic sow feeding in several forms and free access stalls. He says they each have positives and challenges.
Davis is vice-president of swine services with Hord Family Farms based in Marion, Ohio.
The company has been working with loose sow housing in large hog farms for almost 20 years.
“How a system works for you, for your team members, for your family, whatever it might be, it’s going to be different,” Davis said at the Southwestern Ontario Pork Conference earlier this year.
He works for a large system with 30,000 sows in north-central Ohio. The company added another company in southwest Minnesota last fall that added another 15,000 sows. All but 5,000 are housed in pens.
The Canadian code of practice for care and handling of pigs originally set July 1, 2024 as the deadline for all Canadian sows to have some freedom during gestation. That has been pushed to 2029. The National Farm Animal Care Council estimates that about 62 per cent of Canadian hog production has already made the switch.
Barn renovation to loose housing is expensive, and the resulting barns will house fewer sows, says Davis. That means farmers have to choose between building new, producing fewer pigs, or adding to their barns.
In barns where he works, he has seen similar performance between stalls and pens if considering pigs per sow per year, farrowing rate or other important metrics. The best performing farm in his system has sows in pens.
Sows consume about 0.15 per cent more feed when housed in loose pens, he says. He attributes the increase to more sow movement, which burns more energy. Some of that extra is paid back because loose sows weigh more when they are shipped to a processor.
Sow death loss is 1.25 per cent higher in a pen, which is attributable to an increase in fighting, says Davis. There is no difference in how long sows stay in either system.
“We are able to keep and maintain correct parity structure through all of our farms.”
Success depends on people and their mindset.
“You can take the best guy and if he doesn’t have the right mindset, he won’t be able to do pens.”
Hord Family Farms has tried four types of pen housing for pregnant sows and has chosen shoulder stalls for most new builds or renovations.
Shoulder stalls
In the shoulder stall system, also called stanchions, the sows are separated by short stalls while they are fed by feed drops. This simple system gives the sows some protection from others as they are eating.
The farm first installed shoulder stalls in 2007. The sows are in stalls for 42 days and then in shoulder stalls for the rest of gestation. Hord’s normal sow unit is about 2,500 sows in pens of 10.
“I don’t think 10 is a magic number. It’s what we did on our first farm and stayed with it,” says Davis. He’s seen farms with groups ranging from six to 40 sows in shoulder stall pens.
Their stalls are about 20 inches long, but some people use 36 or 48 inches “and they like them.”
Davis said the company made a point of trying different systems.
“We said if we get the opportunity to do the next pen barn, we’re going to purposely do something different. If we just do stanchions, that’s all we’re ever going to know.”
However, its newest barn, which will produce pigs that qualify for Prop 12 standards in California, is also shoulder stalls.
Proposition 12 was passed as a ballot referendum in California in 2018. It created strict provisions for sow housing for pork sold in California. Because California’s citizens consume a lot of pork, but little pork is produced there, the standards have trickled down to producers across the United States.
The new shoulder stall barn has to have 24 square feet per sow in loose housing and limits the time sows can be in a crate. Most barns have 16-21 square feet per pig.
The new barn built by Hord Family Farms has pens with space for 12 feeders. If the premium disappears for Prop 12-influenced barns, the barn can have a denser population.
Free access stalls
Hord Family Farms also uses free access stalls where sows can enter and exit as they wish. The sows are fed at the front of these stalls. Davis says 20 per cent of sows exit on a regular basis. The other 80 per cent go in and stay there most of the day, protected from their counterparts.
Electronic sow feeding options
Davis says Hord has tried two electronic feeding options, in which sows enter a stall, are fed an individual ration, then leave to mingle with the rest of the herd.
The farm has had Schauer electronic sow feeders, which are more complex, can feed greater numbers per unit and gather more data. The Schauer units were removed a couple of years ago due to maintenance issues. Davis says he knows others who use and do well with Schauer units, but they didn’t work with their staff and the amount of upkeep needed as the units aged.
Sows were in groups of about 80 with the electronic sow feeders. Dividers separated the large group, giving sows a place to curl up and also get away from dominant animals.
The Gestal system is a less expensive and simpler, said Davis. Sows enter the stalls and are fed from drops that can be customized to their needs. This allows them to be fed according to their period of gestation and based on body condition evaluation.
Davis said the company reorganized its Gestal systems and it made a difference to performance.
