Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack called for rural economic development as the key to a vibrant farm sector April 21, an unorthodox beginning for an overhaul of U. S. farm policy.
Marking the start of a two-year process
to forge a new Farm Bill, Vilsack told
a House Agriculture Committee hearing
that he wanted to “expand the conversation” about the Farm Bill that will cover biofuels, public nutrition, land stewardship and crop subsidies.
But an Oklahoma congressman said Vilsack missed the point.
Read Also
How Prairie farmers can use cash advances to bridge the gap between input bills and harvest
Farmers can turn cash advances into a financial bridge between harvests, manage surging input costs, without falling prey to pressured grain sales.
“Are you talking about turning rural America into a bedroom community?” asked Frank Lucas, Oklahoma Republican, during the hearing. He said Vilsack ignored farmers to talk about broadband networks and eco-tourism.
In prepared remarks, Vilsack did not mention the Obama administration’s proposals to reduce farm subsidies to large farmers
nor did he propose farm law changes. In
response to a question, he said commercial-size
farmers “clearly need the safety net, the
programs you are working at.”
Most of the 2.2 million U. S. farms are part-time operations whose owners rely on off-farm income to pay their household bills.
Medium-size and large farms account for most of the crop and livestock production. One-fifth of Americans live in rural areas.
“We need a new effort in creating quality jobs in rural America,” Vilsack told the committee.
Agriculture Committee chairman Collin Peterson urged farm groups to consider whether new approaches would
provide a better safety net than the amalgam
of programs now in place and costing
$11 billion annually for crop supports
and land stewardship.
