On-farm feed millers need to ensure they comply with new feed regulations that will soon come into force, says the Animal Nutrition Association of Canada.
“The more complicated the farm, the more controls they’re going to have to have in place,” executive director Melissa Dumont said during a question and answer session at the organization’s annual conference in May.
Why it matters: Modernized national feed regulations have been a work in progress for 13 years.
Read Also
Pig transport stress costs pork sector
Popular livestock trailer designs also increase pig stress during transportation, hitting at meat quality, animal welfare and farm profit, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada researcher says
The feed industry operates a quality assurance program called FeedAssure, which some farms have joined. With new national feed regulations expected in 2024, farmers should check for updated requirements in FeedAssure and ensure they are in compliance with the law.
On-farm feed preparation has become more common as livestock operations expand. How FeedAssure and laws apply to those operations differs based on what they’re doing and for whom.
For example, making feed without medical components for on-farm use only probably won’t require extra steps. However, if meds are being added, more steps and documentation will be required.
If an on-farm mill supplies feed to other farms, it will need to do everything a commercial mill is required to do, as is already the case. Such an operation is “considered a commercial feed mill,” said Dumont.
“They have to meet every single piece of the regulations.”
That includes labelling ingredients, providing hazardous analysis information and ensuring that only approved ingredients are included in rations.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency inspections won’t likely be completely random because there aren’t enough inspectors. Instead, “what they’re going to try to do is identify the higher risk ones,” Dumont said.
A farm with multiple species of livestock will be more likely to attract scrutiny because the risk of disease spread is bigger than in a single-species operation.
“They’re still going to look at it from a risk perspective of animal exposure, residues.”
