Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack down-played his own department’s analysis of U. S. climate legislation Dec. 15, saying “more current” studies do not foresee carbon-capturing trees taking over millions of acres of farmland.
Up to 59 million acres of pasture and cropland could be converted to woodland by 2050 under a cap-and-trade system, according to the Agriculture Department analysis. Trees, to control greenhouse gases, would be more lucrative than crops.
If farmland shifts to trees, crop and livestock output would decline. Critics such as Nebraska Senator Mike Johanns say climate legislation means higher energy and feed prices “will likely drive many producers out of business.”
“I think there are other models that are more current and complete, that might lead to significantly, and will be significantly, different conclusions,” said Vilsack when asked about the USDA study. “We think there can be improvements to the modelling that was used in the past.”
The USDA analysis was based on material from the Environmental Protection Agency.
As an example, Vilsack pointed to a Nov. 11 report by a University of Tennessee think-tank that bioenergy crops could blossom under a cap-and-trade system and would not shift cropland to forests.
USDA concluded 85 per cent of the revenue from agricultural offsets for greenhouse gas emissions would arise from afforestation of pasture and cropland, if contracts paid at least $10 per ton of carbon that is captured.
The forestry offsets would be worth $3 billion a year, USDA estimated, while higher crop and livestock prices, due to less farmland, would add an average $20 billion a year to farm income.
There are 920 million acres of land in U. S. farms, with 325 million acres planted to field crops. The USDA analysis said that at low carbon prices tree planting would occur mostly on pasture land. As prices rise, cropland would account for half or more of the conversions.