Health Canada clears ground beef irradiation

Fresh and frozen ground beef treated with irradiation can now be sold in Canada, the federal health department announced Wednesday.

Health Canada has published regulations in the Canada Gazette which add fresh and frozen ground beef to the short list of irradiated foods, such as potatoes, onions, spices and flour, that are permitted for sale, effective immediately on publication.

“Permitting this technology will give the beef industry another tool to enhance food safety,” Health Canada said Wednesday in a release.

Any foods treated with irradiation must be labelled as such on its packaging, including a written description and the distinctive “Radura” symbol (shown below). Unpackaged foods must have signage displaying the same information at point of sale.

Irradiated foods are treated with low levels of ionizing radiation, which have been shown to reduce levels of harmful bacteria, such as E. coli, salmonella and campylobacter, prevent premature spoilage and extend foods’ shelf lives, the department said.

Irradiation of food by gamma rays, x-rays or high-energy electrons under approved conditions does not cause food to become radioactive, nor does the food come in contact with the radioactive source, the department said.

The process, Health Canada said, “is intended to complement rather than replace existing food safety practices, such as appropriate handling, storage and sanitation.”

The process will not be made mandatory, Health Canada said, and can be applied within permissible amounts “at the discretion of food producers.”

The U.S. has allowed the sale of irradiated ground beef since 1999, Health Canada noted, and 23 other countries including Brazil, South Africa, Saudi Arabia and Russia also allow irradiation of meats. The European Union overall doesn’t allow irradiation for ground beef but member nations such as the U.K., France, Belgium and the Netherlands allow it on chicken meat and poultry.

Health Canada said it reviewed an application in 1998 seeking approval for irradiation of ground beef to reduce microbial load, but the regulatory process wasn’t completed at that time, “due to the large number of questions received expressing concerns related to the safety of the food irradiation process in general.”

A new application “nearly identical to the 1998 submission” was submitted in May 2013, Health Canada said. The department’s safety and efficacy evaluation found the “available scientific data support the safety of irradiating fresh and frozen raw ground beef as described in the current submission” as well as the process’ efficacy in reducing pathogen load.

Among the differences in the 2013 application over the 1998 submission, Health Canada noted, was a request for a higher maximum operating energy level for X-ray machine sources of radiation at 7.5 million electron volts, up from five million. The higher level lines up with the level approved in the U.S.

While the maximum energy level is higher, Health Canada said, the maximum absorbed dose of ionizing radiation in the beef remains the same: 4.5 kilograys for fresh raw ground beef and seven kGy for frozen raw ground beef.

Health Canada’s Food Directorate “has not identified a safety concern with the proposed change to the maximum energy level.”

Health Canada cautioned that irradiation “cannot guarantee the absence of disease-causing microorganisms, but it greatly reduces their number… Irradiated food must still be handled, stored and cooked properly like all other foods.”

The 2013 application came from the Canadian Cattlemen’s Association, which at the time said that “combined with food safety interventions already in use, irradiation could essentially eliminate E. coli-related illness associated with ground beef… (which is) reason enough to support making this choice available to Canadians.”

The CCA said Wednesday buying irradiated ground beef “is now a choice for Canadian consumers, the same choice that has been available in the U.S. for more than a decade.”

That said, the CCA added, the availability of irradiated beef “will take time to establish and will depend on consumer demand for this type of product.”

The Canadian Meat Council, which supported the CCA’s application, said at the time the process could help “reduce human illness and suffering; decrease healthcare expenditures; improve confidence in Canada’s food safety system; benefit Canadians economically; and, finally, provide Canadian consumers with the opportunity to exercise individual choice, a freedom which (U.S.) consumers have long held.”

The CMC at the time said it would also encourage Health Canada to give “prompt consideration to science-based  proposals on irradiation as an effective food safety technology for other meat products such as beef trim as well as chicken meat and poultry.”

During consultations last year on the proposed regulatory changes, Canada’s National Farmers Union came out opposed, saying larger beef packers such as Cargill and JBS, could turn to irradiation as a cost-cutting food safety measure, further undercutting smaller packers on beef pricing.

The NFU at the time said it was also concerned packers and processors might use irradiation as a crutch “to compensate for unsanitary conditions and inadequate procedures (and) instil a false confidence in the meat’s safety.”

Processors, the NFU said, could use irradiation to control “fecal contamination of carcasses that occurs when processing high volumes at high speeds without adequate inspection of production lines.” — Network

Canada’s farm machinery makers want to grow their export market in the coming years, a development they say would be a good news story for rural Canada as a whole. “Canadian-made farm equipment is among the highest quality and most sought out in the world,” Leah Olson, president of the Agricultural Manufacturers of Canada (AMC), told the Senate agriculture committee. “In 2016, Canadian farm equipment manufacturers exported more than $1.8 billion worth of implements to 151 countries, this in spite of just over 50 per cent of agricultural equipment manufacturers being located in rural communities of less than 10,000. Some of our members are located on the family farm or in communities where the number of people the manufacturer employs is larger than the community it is in.” One reason more than half of agriculture equipment makers are in rural communities is that places them close to the producers who “despite the harsh growing conditions in Canada, provide manufacturers with feedback on the challenges they encounter in the field,” she said. That relationship creates a sense of innovation that is reflected in “how we manufacture and manage our day-to-day operations,” she said. “It is what drives us to develop some of the best agricultural equipment in the world.” Federal role AMC says the federal government has a role to play, including supporting industry efforts at key international farm shows and clearing obstacles they say prevent smaller- and medium-size agricultural equipment manufacturers from reaching their full potential, Olson said. “For example, visas and getting entry into a country more easily for business purposes,” Olson said. “Another example is supporting Export Development Canada in regions like Latin America where securing financing terms and conditions is not always feasible. Opening up international markets is integral to Canada’s innovative and sustainable future.” AMC also said the government should consider a higher capital cost allowance for farmers, especially in light of the looming carbon tax, to allow a Canadian farmer to maintain profitability internationally. It would enable farmers to a move to more quickly adopt the looming new technology in farming. Equipment makers also innovate in response to the demand for a more sustainable food production, Olson said. “With all of the focus on greener technologies, we have a unique opportunity to help to inform the green agenda and ensure that farmers continue to be recognized as the key environmentalists that they are,” Olson said. “Amongst AMC members, many are solving challenges related to fertilizer and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” Olson added that in the future there’s little doubt Canadian farmers will be at the forefront managing and being stewards for healthy soil, water and air, and technological adoption is key to that. “How we grow food today is not how we will grow it in 150, 50 or even 10 years from now,” Olson said. “As an exporter of safe and secure food, Canada’s comparative advantage globally is its agriculture industry.” To maintain that status, “the government has to be very careful as to how it wants to proceed because if it doesn’t allow farmers to continue making profits, then they won’t be able to reinvest into equipment that helps them be good stewards of the land,” she said. Labour crunch Among the challenges faced by rural employers is finding workers. Westfield, which makes grain augers in Rosenort, a half an hour outside of Winnipeg, “is bussing people from the city to come out to work because they need people to be working at the facility. It’s a great example of the sort of employment opportunities that are in rural Canada. When we look at innovation, and those manufacturers export all around the world. I know that we have a couple of members — one is in northern Alberta — and they export consistently to over 40 countries.” Canadian agriculture machinery makers are all short lines, she said. “They are very specialized and focus on whether it’s grain handling and storage, like in Ag Growth International or Meridian or it is harvesting equipment like MacDon. They compete world­wide.” The companies are interested in adding artificial intelligence to their products, she said. More research is required to make machines work together on their own. “When we look at where we want to be, it would be ideal if we had more drone technology, autonomous facilities in fields because then it helps the farmers who then don’t have to rely on labour shortages and trying to fill those labour shortages,” she said.

About the author


Glacier FarmMedia Feed

Glacier FarmMedia, a division of Glacier Media, is Canada's largest publisher of agricultural news in print and online.

GFM Network News's recent articles



Stories from our other publications