The derailment of DuPont’s intended acquisition of a top South African seed company – a deal that would have doubled DuPont’s African seed business – is emboldening activists opposed to creeping control by both DuPont and rival Monsanto of the lucrative emerging market.
Citing unfair control in South Africa by the two dominant U.S. seed companies, South African activists successfully convinced regulators last month to deny the bid by DuPont’s agricultural unit, Pioneer Hi-Bred, to buy South Africa’s largest seed company, Pannar Seed Ltd.
Now, opponents say they are planning to push for a regulatory investigation of the dominant position global seed leader Monsanto holds in the genetically modified seed sector in South Africa.
They argue allowing foreign corporate control of South Africa’s seed supply would erode availability of traditional conventional seed varieties, hurt export business with countries opposed to biotech crops, and force farmers deep into debt to pay for expensive seeds that are the patented properties of the U.S. corporations.
“This is only the beginning of the battle over the control of seeds in (South Africa),” said Mariam Mayet, environmental attorney and director of the Africa Centre for Biosafety (ACB).
Mayet said the group was preparing a study of Monsanto’s seed holdings and all the licensing and cross-licensing agreements in South Africa, particularly those dealing with corn or maize. The group will make a formal application to the South African Competition Commission to investigate and take action to protect against “negative socio-economic impacts,” Mayet said.
The South African Competition Commission confirmed Dec. 8 it was rejecting Pioneer’s proposed acquisition of Pannar Seed due to concerns about market concentration.
Pioneer has said it will appeal the decision and still hopes to prevail, though activists said they will keep up their pressure on regulators to stop the acquisition.
The purchase of Pannar – for a price the parties have not disclosed – would have doubled Pioneer’s seed sales on the continent to $200 million, and would have given it access to a broad base of local germplasm.
Company officials had touted the deal as the company’s largest ever, and said the 52-year-old South Africa-based seed germplasm company – which specializes in maize and sorghum and operates seed businesses in nine African countries – would help it broaden its infrastructure across the continent.
Pioneer’s bid for a controlling stake in Pannar marked the latest in a series of moves by major agricultural companies to stake a claim in Africa as concerns mount about global food security and population growth.
Pioneer and Monsanto both see Africa as a key part of their international expansion efforts, affording substantial profit opportunities.
The companies argue their specialized seeds will make farmers more productive, improve local livelihoods and help lift up a continent stricken by poverty.
“You look at the continent of Africa that has basically been flatlined in agricultural productivity for the last number of decades,” said Pioneer president Paul Schickler. “If you can triple the productivity of Africa overall, that has a great impact.”
The hybrid corn, or maize, market in South Africa is worth an estimated $250 million. Pioneer claims about a one-third market share.
Monsanto would not disclose its market share, but its influence is undeniable. Pioneer officials say about 75 per cent of the hybrid maize planted in South Africa includes biotech traits derived from Monsanto, including Pioneer sales of hybrids that contain Monsantopatented traits.
Across all of Africa there are an estimated 75 million acres, or 30 million hectares, available for maize production. Average grain yields are just one tonne per hectare, only one-fifth of yields in developed countries.
Both Monsanto and Pioneer have been adding to their market strength in Africa through alliances with local agricultural organizations and acquisitions.
But as both companies have expanded, criticism has grown, as some accuse Monsanto and Pioneer of using the spectre of hunger and poverty to promote controversial genetic engineering that critics fear is not safe and not environmentally friendly.
“GM seeds are not the solution to food security. Patented GM crops are a major obstacle to local food security and sovereignty,” said Glenn Ashton, a BIOWATCH spokesman.
The African Centre for Biosafety, BioWatch South Africa NGO, and even some U.S. organizations argue against the expansion of the U.S. seed conglomerates in Africa.
“This is about livelihoods, what people get to eat, how it is grown, and environmental implications. You are going to have two American companies control it all,” said Anuradha Mittal, executive director of The Oakland Institute, a policy think-tank focused on social, environmental and economic issues.
“They try to hoodwink us by talking about it in terms of feeding Africa. It is nothing else than the takeover of African agriculture,” she said.