The capital campaign for the project announced on June 5 that Warburtons, a family-owned company based in Greater Manchester, contributed $650,000 to the project.

WHY IT MATTERS: Once complete, the Global Agriculture Technology Exchange will replace Cereals Canada’s leased space in the Canadian Grain Commission building in Winnipeg.

Warburtons has a longstanding partnership with Cereals Canada and has sourced significant volumes of Canadian wheat from Western Canada, according to a press release from capital campaign chair JoAnne Buth.

“Cereals Canada and Warburtons share a deep commitment to quality and innovation,” she said.

She added that Cereals Canada is “thrilled to make this announcement alongside Warburtons, and we are grateful for their support.”

Warburtons has utilized the current Cereals Canada facility in Winnipeg for many years. The pilot bakery, mill and analytical lab at the facility has been used to test and analyze western Canadian wheat before it is exported to the United Kingdom for production.

Warburtons partnered with Cereals Canada in 2016 for a multi-year pulse research project with a goal to produce healthier baked goods.

“Warburtons has proudly partnered with Canadian farmers and the agriculture industry for over 30 years to source the highest quality wheat through our Identity Preserved Program,” said Adam Dyck, Canadian program manager for Warburtons.

“For the past 15 years, Cereals Canada has played a vital role in supporting our commitment to quality and innovation,” he said, adding that their contribution “reflects the value we place on Canadian agriculture and our strong belief in innovation, collaboration and long-term relationships.”

“This facility will help ensure that Cereals Canada remains a global leader, and we’re honoured to support that vision,” he said.

The fundraising project for the exchange, which will be located in downtown Winnipeg, has raised just over $32 million towards its goal of $100 million.

The stated vision for the Cereals Canada project is to provide the tools necessary to allow Cereals Canada to maintain the globally recognized expertise of Canada’s wheat industry and maintain Canada’s global role as a supplier of high-quality wheat.

The post Cereals Canada hub receives international support appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

Glacier FarmMedia reporters and contributors from Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and Manitoba asked farmers about their election priorities, how represented by the federal government they’ve felt — and finally, if there’s anything they’d like farmers from other regions to understand about the issues they face.

In part four, farmers reflect on what they’d like farmers from other regions to understand about the issues they face.

Read part one, part two and part three.

For more election coverage, visit the Western Producer’s election page.

Ontario

Dairy farmer Davina Garner would prefer if there was a better understanding of the different pressures faced by farmers in the East versus the West. As the organizer of an all-candidates’ meeting on behalf of the Oxford County Federation of Agriculture, she believes there’s a wider range of farms in Ontario than on the Prairies.

“Plus I think we tend to be more limited here by red tape if we want to expand,” Garner added.

Garner’s biggest concern during the campaign is whether the parties’ efforts to tackle the perceived housing crisis will accelerate the loss of prime agricultural land in the province.

Pete Overdevest said it’s unfortunate that the news and culture of Toronto is often what Western farmers hear when it’s a completely different reality in Ontario’s farm country.

Matt Underwood suggested western farmers might benefit from knowing that most of their Ontario counterparts live in ridings that have stayed blue for several elections.

Alberta

Phil Constantin said producers across the country can all agree on many concerns in the industry.

“I think at one time or another we all face each other’s problems. We’re all facing droughts, we’re all facing floods. But I think the biggest thing is when we have a swing this big on pricing,” he said.

Constantin said the lack of competition in grains pricing is damning to the industry.

“We don’t have enough competition in the grain market at all.… We’ve lost Viterra to Bunge, so what do we have for competition? We used to have the Canadian Wheat Board, and we had farmers running it at the end and doing a great job, but they shut us down. Then they took all our assets and sold it to G3.”

Bryan Perkins sees Alberta agriculture as an export-first economy as opposed to other regions that can rely more on domestic consumption. In a global trade war, that is a worry.

“Our Western Canadian agriculture is very much oriented to export kinds of commodities. Certainly we use our products here in Canada, but a lot of the products — whether it be livestock or grains or oilseeds — are heavily exported,” he said.

“We have to be concerned about the supply managed sector having undue influence on trade negotiations,” he added. “I think it can be framed in a way, certainly, that makes it possible to still have that kind of program in place, but yet there needs to be respect for those of us who … are very much oriented to the export markets.”

Manitoba

Grain and oilseed farmer Curtis McCrae said he has a neighbor from Ontario who still farms in that province. Their priorities are very similar.

“We think a lot alike,” he said.

Manitoba is much more export-oriented than Ontario, he noted. Farmers there might not understand how crucial infrastructure like ports and railways are to producers in the West, and the magnitude of threats posed by strikes.

Quebec

No answer provided.

The post ‘Don’t equate us with Toronto news, culture’ Ontario farmers tell western colleagues appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

Canadians lose sight of how big their country is — unless, for example, they get to rub shoulders with Europeans who are staggered by the time it takes to drive across a single province.

It’s big — and with that comes the challenges of bridging different geographies and climate zones, regional cultures, languages, resources and economic needs.

Glacier FarmMedia reporters and contributors from Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec asked farmers about their priorities, how represented by the federal government they’ve felt — and finally, if there’s anything they’d like farmers from other regions to understand about the issues they face.

WHY IT MATTERS: Canadian farmers head to the polls with the rest of the country April 28 for Canada’s 2025 federal election.

Trump and tariffs

Manitoba

Tariffs were the top concern for Scott Peters, a hog farmer near Steinbach in southeastern Manitoba.

“At any time it could change, so we have to be ready for anything,” he said.

Harley Siemens, an egg producer in south-central and southeastern Manitoba, said while egg farmers aren’t the ones in the cross-hairs, they are concerned that the supply-managed sectors stay in place.

“We still care about the system’s integrity,” he said.

Canadian dairy, specifically, has been a point of contention in Canada-U.S. relations, though Prime Minister Mark Carney has said dairy is off the table in trade negotiations and the Conservatives have voiced their support as well.

Curtis McCrae raised the spectre of Chinese tariffs on Canadian goods like canola oil and meal, peas and pork, which are typically thought of as retaliation after Canada placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.

He said that if the federal government is going to use farmers as a “sacrificial lamb,” it needs to financially support farmers. “I can’t see electric vehicles ever overtaking agriculture as an economic driver of this country.”

Alberta

Bryan Perkins owns a mixed hog and grain operation in the municipal district of Wainwright in east-central Alberta. Perkins said the on-again, off-again rollercoaster of U.S. tariffs is putting a strain on the industry and supports from the government may not be timely enough to help farmers who face hardships due to the trade war.

“There were indications by our current government that they want to do something through AgriStability, but the impact of that is well down the road,” Perkins said. “If there are benefits that might come from that, it’s months or years down the road. And we have issues now that are really affecting us at this point in time.”

Phil Constantin is a grain grower in Sturgeon County north of Edmonton. He said that although the U.S. tariff situation is harmful to the Canadian agriculture industry, he believes that President Trump is only standing up for his country.

“We do need to address this free trade agreement. These tariffs are doing nothing but hurting everybody,” Constantin said.

“And I know everybody is complaining about Trump, but I mean, the guy is looking out for his country. We need somebody like that for this country.”

Ontario

Although the tariffs might not always be top-of-mind for Ontario farmers as they contemplate the April 28 vote, it’s never far from the top of the list.

“We’ve got a bully right now. And he’s got (Canadian supply-managed agriculture) in his sights,” said dairy producer Braydon Older. who farms near Embro in southwestern Ontario. “(Donald Trump is) obsessed with it, and I don’t know how that can work out good for us.”

“It just seems that one day Trump can wake up in a good mood and lay off the tariffs and then the next day wake up on the wrong side of the bed and say ‘let’s tariff everyone’,” said crop farmer Matt Underwood from the Wingham area.

Underwood said the federal government should be softening the blow of tariff uncertainty by promoting Canadian farm products more globally.

“We need to make sure we’re open to working with more buyers,” he told Glacier FarmMedia. “That’s both for Ontario and for the West. We really need to be highlighting what Canadian farmers have to offer to the world.”

Quebec

Christian Hébert is an apple and raspberry producer near Deschambault, west of Québec City. He’s also a Bloc Québécois’ candidate for the riding of Portneuf-Jacques Cartier. His comments have been translated from French.

He said the pandemic, climate change and now economic war with the U.S. have compounded the burdens on farms.

“The economic burden is so astronomic that youth consider themselves as the lost, or forgotten, generation,” he said. “I don’t want to be alarmist, but we’ve been experiencing this for the past forty years, and by “this” I mean the decline of agriculture.”

This year he’s seeing even more farms going out of business — some choosing to leave despite still being profitable, due to stress and exhaustion.

Business environment

Manitoba

Business risk management (BRM) programs need to be improved, said Peters. “There are things that are happening, but it’s all within the same structure, and I think some of the structure is outdated and for sure not responsive enough.”

He noted that rural crime is an issue for hog producers. Peters said his barns have been broken into several times.

Peters also noted he’d like to see the federal government promote domestic processing and manufacturing.

McCrae said that government restrictions like the price on carbon and tier four emissions on machinery have made the economy weak.

“Hopefully the next government that gets in understands that we need to unleash our economic power,” McCrae said.

Siemens said he’d like to see federal red tape reduced. He also said poultry farmers need better insurance against avian influenza outbreaks, noting the CFIA’s per-head payment hasn’t been updated in many years.

Alberta

Constantin said programs like AgriInvest must be improved to help farmers keep their operations strong in today’s shifting global market.

“I don’t really want to be subsidized, but when this kind of stuff comes up, we need some kind of safeguard to help us out and maintain things,” he said. “They call it AgriInvest, but it doesn’t really work. I mean, you’ve got to qualify for it, and even if you do, you don’t see money until years down the road.”

Perkins spoke about issues he sees in the world of the agriculture business and how the global marketplace is changing the way Canadian farmers do business. “The uncertainties in the marketplace that are there, whether it be Chinese tariffs or the potential trade disruptions that might occur along the way from that, they’re causing turmoil as well,” Perkins said.

“The machinery we buy or the various inputs that we buy are all affected by this turmoil in world trade.”

Ontario

Underwood is optimistic during this election that there’s a chance to overturn “the status quo” in Ottawa and begin promoting Canadian agriculture at home and abroad.

“There’s a lot of opportunity for our government to support farmers more,” he said. Examples could include a carbon tax exemption for businesses that dry grain and efforts on a global scale to facilitate export of Canadian farm products outside North American.

Oxford-area dairy farmers Pete Overdevest and Davina Garner want to see less red tape for farm construction and/or expansion.

Quebec

Hébert said there’s a lack of support for small and mid-sized farms both at the provincial and federal levels.

“Support programs are abandoning this section of the industry,” he said. “The majority of farms in Québec and Canada are approaching this critical zone: they are no longer a small farm, but they are not a large enterprise either. Insurance and financing programs are not designed for them and innovation support programs don’t work.”

The sector also needs to look into the future and think about how climate change will affect crop production methods and insurance programs, he added.

Representing farmers

Manitoba

McCrae said his biggest fear is that eastern voters will forget what has happened in the last ten years.

“We haven’t been represented as part of the country. We’ve just been where everything gets pushed to solve problems,” he said.

He said he’d love to see a government that understands the importance of primary industry, and the growth it can spur in the rest of the economy.

Peters, who sits on the Canadian Pork Council, said representation has been OK at times. It can be difficult to get meetings with officials, but he understands they are very busy.

However, he said AgriStability has been toyed with too much, and programs have been cut — possibly because agriculture is poorly understood or forgotten.

Alberta

Perkins said agriculture seems to get lost in the mix, while tariffs on other industries receive all the attention from the federal government.

“They’re spending a lot of time working on and being worried about tariffs and whatnot, but we’re here with 100 per cent tariffs on canola oil and canola meal and 25 per cent tariffs on pork going to China, and there just doesn’t seem to be a whisper on that,” he said.

“Yet, when there’s a 25 per cent tariff on automobiles or steel and aluminum — and those are all really important industries, for sure — all of a sudden there’s lots of government attention,” Perkins said.

China placed tariffs on agricultural products in retaliation for those Canada placed on electric vehicles, he said.

Ontario

The farmers Glacier FarmMedia spoke with generally felt well represented by their MPs. In all cases, those were Conservative MPs elected in ridings where agriculture is a significant economic driver.

“From Ottawa as a whole, though, I don’t feel the current government provides as much support as I would like to see for grain farmers across the country,” said Underwood.

Older says he “feel(s) like we’re rudderless right now.” He criticized former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for proroguing Parliament immediately upon announcing his intention to step down as Liberal leader. He also mused about the possibility that the nation could — if Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives win the election — potentially be led by three different prime ministers within a few months.

Overdevest, who is on the Dairy Farmers of Ontario board, says the ruling Liberals made campaign promises in the past but failed to follow through once elected. He expects little better this time.

Overdevest and Older shared the concern that if the Liberals secure a third successive victory the alienation due to lack of representation for farmers — particularly Prairie farmers — in Ottawa will rise to troubling levels.

Older wants to hear assurances from party leaders this campaign that supply management will be protected in any trade negotiations. But he admitted he worries that putting too much emphasis on poultry, eggs and dairy could leave voters in Western Canadian farm country feeling left out.

“We need to be united over the whole country,” agreed Overdevest.

Quebec

“The strongest element of a society is also its weakest link: its farmers,” said Hébert.

“We can’t just pick up tomorrow and go. So, if farmers’ concerns are not prioritized in public policy, then we’ll be the first ones sacrificed. I find this very sad.”

Hébert said Quebecers unanimously support reciprocal norms — that is, that imported products sold in Québec must be subject to the same standards and requirements as Québec products.

“The federal government is not playing an adequate role in terms of control over products coming through the border,” he said.

Hébert said in recent years there have been several demonstrations in Quebec, other provinces, the U.S. about reciprocal norms.

What do you want other farmers to know?

Manitoba

McCrae said he has a neighbor from Ontario who still farms in that province. Their priorities are very similar.

“We think a lot alike,” he said.

Manitoba is much more export-oriented than Ontario, he noted. Farmers there might not understand how crucial infrastructure like ports and railways are to producers in the West, and the magnitude of threats posed by strikes.

Alberta

Constantin said producers across the country can all agree on many concerns in the industry.

“I think at one time or another we all face each other’s problems. We’re all facing droughts, we’re all facing floods. But I think the biggest thing is when we have a swing this big on pricing,” he said.

Constantin said the lack of competition in grains pricing is damning to the industry.

“We don’t have enough competition in the grain market at all.… We’ve lost Viterra to Bunge, so what do we have for competition? We used to have the Canadian Wheat Board, and we had farmers running it at the end and doing a great job, but they shut us down. Then they took all our assets and sold it to G3.”

Perkins sees Alberta agriculture as an export-first economy as opposed to other regions that can rely more on domestic consumption. In a global trade war, that is a worry.

“Our western Canadian agriculture is very much oriented to export kinds of commodities. Certainly we use our products here in Canada, but a lot of the products — whether it be livestock or grains or oilseeds — are heavily exported,” he said.

“We have to be concerned about the supply managed sector having undue influence on trade negotiations,” he added. “I think it can be framed in a way, certainly, that makes it possible to still have that kind of program in place, but yet there needs to be respect for those of us who … are very much oriented to the export markets.”

Ontario

Garner would prefer if there was a better understanding of the different pressures faced by farmers in the East versus the West. As the organizer of an all-candidates’ meeting on behalf of the Oxford County Federation of Agriculture, she believes there’s a wider range of farms in Ontario than on the Prairies.

“Plus I think we tend to be more limited here by red tape if we want to expand,” Garner added.

Garner’s biggest concern during the campaign is whether the parties’ efforts to tackle the perceived housing crisis will accelerate the loss of prime agricultural land in the province.

Overdevest says it’s unfortunate that the news and culture of Toronto is often what Western farmers hear, when it’s a completely different reality in Ontario’s farm country.

Underwood suggesting western farmers might benefit from knowing that most of their Ontario counterparts live in ridings that have stayed blue for several elections.

This report is a collaboration of journalists who contribute to Glacier FarmMedia’s network of agricultural publications. Geralyn Wichers is Glacier FarmMedia’s associate digital editor and an award-winning agricultural journalist. She compiled this article. Zak McLachlan writes from Wainwright, Alta., and regularly contributes to Alberta Farmer Express, the Manitoba Co-operator and The Western Producer. Stew Slater operates a small dairy farm on 150 acres near St. Marys, Ont., and has been writing about rural and agricultural issues since 1999. April Stewart is editor of Country Guide magazine and works and farms in rural Quebec.

The post THE FARM VOTE: Farmers run down priorities ahead of the 2025 Canadian federal election appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

Glacier FarmMedia reporters and contributors from Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and Manitoba asked farmers about their election priorities, how represented by the federal government they’ve felt — and finally, if there’s anything they’d like farmers from other regions to understand about the issues they face.

In part three of this series, farmers answer the question, “Do you feel represented by the federal government?”

Read part one and part two of the series, which look at farmers’ views on U.S. President Donald Trump, trade, the economy, and what the federal government can do to build a better business environment.

For more coverage of the 2025 federal election, visit the Western Producer’s election page.

Ontario

Ontario farmers Glacier FarmMedia spoke to felt generally well represented by their MPs. In all cases, those were Conservative MPs elected in ridings where agriculture is a significant economic driver.

“From Ottawa as a whole, though, I don’t feel the current government provides as much support as I would like to see for grain farmers across the country,” said Matt Underwood.

Brayden Older, a dairy farmer near Embro, says he “feel(s) like we’re rudderless right now.” He criticized former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for proroguing Parliament immediately upon announcing his intention to step down as Liberal leader. He also mused about the possibility that the nation could — if Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives win the election — potentially be led by three different prime ministers within a few months.

Pete Overdevest, who is on the Dairy Farmers of Ontario board, says the ruling Liberals made campaign promises in the past but failed to follow through once elected. He expects little better this time.

Overdevest and fellow dairy farmer Braydon Older shared the concern that if the Liberals secure a third successive victory the alienation due to lack of representation for farmers — particularly Prairie farmers — in Ottawa will rise to troubling levels.

Older wants to hear assurances from party leaders this campaign that supply management will be protected in any trade negotiations. But he admitted he worries that putting too much emphasis on poultry, eggs and dairy could leave voters in Western Canadian farm country feeling left out.

“We need to be united over the whole country,” agreed Overdevest.

Quebec

“The strongest element of a society is also its weakest link: its farmers,” said fruit producer and Bloc Québécois candidate Christian Hébert. His comments are translated from French.

“We can’t just pick up tomorrow and go. So, if farmers’ concerns are not prioritized in public policy, then we’ll be the first ones sacrificed. I find this very sad.”

Hébert said Quebecers unanimously support reciprocal norms — that is, that imported products sold in Québec must be subject to the same standards and requirements as Québec products.

“The federal government is not playing an adequate role in terms of control over products coming through the border,” he said.

Hébert said in recent years there have been several demonstrations in Quebec, other provinces and the U.S. about reciprocal norms.

Manitoba

Curtis McCrae said his biggest fear is that eastern voters will forget what has happened in the last ten years.

“We haven’t been represented as part of the country. We’ve just been where everything gets pushed to solve problems,” he said.

He said he’d love to see a government that understands the importance of primary industry, and the growth it can spur in the rest of the economy.

Scott Peters, who sits on the Canadian Pork Council, said representation has been okay at times. It can be difficult to get meetings with officials, but he understands they are very busy.

However, he said AgriStability has been toyed with too much, and programs have been cut — possibly because agriculture is poorly understood or forgotten.

Alberta

Hog and grain farmer Bryan Perkins said agriculture seems to get lost in the mix, while tariffs on other industries receive all the attention from the federal government.

“They’re spending a lot of time working on and being worried about tariffs and whatnot, but we’re here with 100 per cent tariffs on canola oil and canola meal and 25 per cent tariffs on pork going to China, and there just doesn’t seem to be a whisper on that,” he said.

“Yet, when there’s a 25 per cent tariff on automobiles or steel and aluminum — and those are all really important industries, for sure — all of a sudden there’s lots of government attention,” Perkins said.

China placed tariffs on agricultural products in retaliation for those Canada placed on electric vehicles, he said.

The post Canadian farmers’ view of the federal government differs by province — but not by much appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

Glacier FarmMedia reporters and contributors from Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and Manitoba asked farmers about their election priorities, how represented by the federal government they’ve felt — and finally, if there’s anything they’d like farmers from other regions to understand about the issues they face.

In part two, farmers air their concerns about trade and the Canadian economy, and what the federal government should do to promote a better business environment. Read part one to see their thoughts on U.S. President Donald Trump and tariffs.

For more coverage of the 2025 federal elections, visit the Western Producer’s elections page.

Ontario

Crop farmer Matt Underwood is optimistic during this election that there’s a chance to overturn “the status quo” in Ottawa and begin promoting Canadian agriculture at home and abroad.

“There’s a lot of opportunity for our government to support farmers more,” he said. Examples could include a carbon tax exemption for businesses that dry grains and efforts on a global scale to facilitate export of Canadian farm products outside North American.

Oxford dairy farmers Pete Overdevest and Davina Garner want to see less red tape for farm construction and/or expansion.

Quebec

Fruit producer and Bloc Québécois candidate Christian Hébert said there’s a lack of support for small and mid-sized farms both at the provincial and federal level. His comments are translated from French.

“Support programs are abandoning this section of the industry,” he said. “The majority of farms in Québec and Canada are approaching this critical zone: they are no longer a small farm, but they are not a large enterprise either. Insurance and financing programs are not designed for them and innovation support programs don’t work.”

The sector also needs to look into the future and think about how climate change will affect crop production methods and insurance programs, he added.

Alberta

Grain grower Phil Constantin said programs like AgriInvest must be improved to help farmers keep their operations strong in today’s shifting global market.

“I don’t really want to be subsidized, but when this kind of stuff comes up, we need some kind of safeguard to help us out and maintain things,” he said. “They call it AgriInvest, but it doesn’t really work. I mean, you’ve got to qualify for it, and even if you do, you don’t see money until years down the road.”

Hog and grain farmer Bryan Perkins spoke about issues he sees in the world of the agriculture business and how the global marketplace is changing the way Canadian farmers do business.

“The uncertainties in the marketplace that are there, whether it be Chinese tariffs or the potential trade disruptions that might occur along the way from that, they’re causing turmoil as well,” Perkins said.

“The machinery we buy or the various inputs that we buy are all affected by this turmoil in world trade.”

Manitoba

BRM programs need to be improved, said hog farmer Scott Peters. “There are things that are happening, but it’s all within the same structure, and I think some of the structure is outdated and for sure not responsive enough.”

He noted that rural crime is an issue for hog producers. Peters said his barns have been broken into several times.

Peters also noted he’d like to see the federal government promote domestic processing and manufacturing.

Crop farmer Curtis McCrae said that government restrictions like the price on carbon and tier four emissions on machinery have made the economy weak.

“Hopefully the next government that gets in understands that we need to unleash our economic power,” McCrae said.

Egg farmer Harley Siemens said he’d like to see federal red tape reduced. He also said poultry farmers need better insurance against avian influenza outbreaks, noting the CFIA’s per-head payment hasn’t been updated in many years.

The post Canadian farmers reveal concerns ahead of federal election | Part 2 appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

Canadians often lose sight of how big their country is — unless, for example, they get to rub shoulders with Europeans who are staggered by the time it takes to drive across a single province.

Canada is big — and with that comes the challenges of bridging different geographies and climate zones, regional cultures, languages, resources and economic needs.

Glacier FarmMedia reporters and contributors from Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and Manitoba asked farmers about their election priorities, how represented by the federal government they’ve felt — and finally, if there’s anything they’d like farmers from other regions to understand about the issues they face.

Here is what they said about trade tensions with the U.S.

For more coverage of the 2025 federal election, visit the Western Producer’s elections tab.

Ontario

Although the tariffs might not always be top-of-mind for Ontario farmers as they contemplate the April 28 vote, it’s never far from the top of the list.

“We’ve got a bully right now. And he’s got (Canadian supply-managed agriculture) in his sights,” said Embro area dairy producer Braydon Older. “[Donald Trump is] obsessed with it, and I don’t know how that can work out good for us.”

“It just seems that one day Trump can wake up in a good mood and lay off the tariffs and then the next day wake up on the wrong side of the bed and say ‘let’s tariff everyone’,” said crop farmer Matt Underwood from the Wingham area.

Underwood said the federal government should be softening the blow of tariff uncertainty by promoting Canadian farm products more globally.

“We need to make sure we’re open to working with more buyers,” he said. “That’s both for Ontario and for the West. We really need to be highlighting what Canadian farmers have to offer to the world.”

Quebec

Christian Hébert is an apple and raspberry producer near Deschambault-Grondines, west of Québec City. He’s also a Bloc Québécois candidate for the riding of Portneuf-Jacques Cartier. His comments have been translated from French.

He said the pandemic, climate change and now economic war with the United States have compounded the burdens on farms.

“The economic burden is so astronomic that youth consider themselves as the lost, or forgotten, generation,” he said. “I don’t want to be alarmist, but we’ve been experiencing this for the past forty years, and by “this” I mean the decline of agriculture.”

This year he’s seeing even more farms going out of business — some choosing to leave despite still being profitable, due to stress and exhaustion.

Alberta

Bryan Perkins owns a mixed pig and grain farm operation in the municipal district of Wainwright in east-central Alberta. Perkins said the on-again, off-again rollercoaster of U.S. tariffs is putting a strain on the industry and supports from the government may not be timely enough to help farmers who face hardships due to the trade war.

“There were indications by our current government that they want to do something through AgriStability, but the impact of that is well down the road,” Perkins said. “If there are benefits that might come from that, it’s months or years down the road. And we have issues now that are really affecting us at this point in time.”

Phil Constantin is a grain grower in Sturgeon County north of Edmonton. He said that although the U.S. tariff situation is harmful to the Canadian agriculture industry, he believes that President Trump is only standing up for his country.

“We do need to address this free trade agreement. These tariffs are doing nothing but hurting everybody,” Constantin said.

“And I know everybody is complaining about Trump, but I mean, the guy is looking out for his country. We need somebody like that for this country.”

Manitoba

Tariffs were the top concern for Scott Peters, a hog farmer near Steinbach in southeastern Manitoba.

“At any time it could change, so we have to be ready for anything,” he said.

Harley Siemens, an egg producer in south-central and southeastern Manitoba, said while egg farmers aren’t the ones in the cross-hairs, they are concerned that the supply-managed sectors stay in place.

“We still care about the system’s integrity,” he said.

Canadian dairy, specifically, has been a point of contention in Canada-U.S. relations, though Prime Minister Mark Carney has said dairy is off the table in trade negotiations.

Curtis McCrae raised the specter of Chinese tariffs on Canadian goods like canola oil and meal, peas and pork, which are typically thought of as retaliation after Canada placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.

He said that if the federal government is going to use farmers as a “sacrificial lamb,” it needs to financially support farmers. “I can’t see electric vehicles ever overtaking agriculture as an economic driver of this country.”

The post Canadian farmers reveal concerns ahead of federal election appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

The U.S. implemented 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods the morning of the opening day of the convention, which had speaker and attendees focused heavily on the cross-border trade conflict.

A pause was placed on the tariffs just hours after the convention wrapped up.

Right from the start of the speaking agenda, tariffs took the spotlight.

Economic challenges nothing new

Economist Todd Hirsch told attendees that although the political landscape and and the economic uncertainty it has created are troubling, it’s not the first time the Canadian and global economies have faced major economic changes.

He said major global events like 9/11, stock market crashes and the Covid-19 pandemic have shook the global economy in the past, but it has always pulled through.

“What is happening today isn’t all that unusual. I mean, this exact situation is unusual, but we’ve been through these sort of cataclysmic shifts in reality in the past. And we got through them,” Hirsch said.

“Everything has shifted, and now the path forward is very, very unclear. But there are lots of examples of when we moved forward.”

‘Darkest day’ says Harper

Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper was the convention’s final speaker, and he did not mince words when it came to the U.S. enforcing its tariffs on Canada.

“What happened on Tuesday with the imposition of these across-the-board tariffs, as a Canadian and from the standpoint of our nation, was the darkest day I have experienced since I left Ottawa. This is a very worrisome thing,” he said.

But he added that it is not all gloom and doom, as he does not expect the heavy-handed sweeping tariffs to last too long.

“We need to remember that no organization in the United States with any significance is asking for this. It really is the agenda of the President himself. And secondly, let’s not forget that while we are going to be hurt by this, it is Americans who are going to be hurt right away… So I think there will be pressure in the United States that will grow for this to be addressed,” Harper said.

“In my opinion, we should be calm, and I think try to be optimistic… Now, staying calm doesn’t mean we don’t retaliate. It doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have a plan. But we should stay calm.”

Don’t make drastic moves: Castillo

North American Export Grain Association president Alejandra Castillo said during a multi-national panel discussing cross-border perspectives that with the tariff situation constantly changing on a near-daily basis, it is important right now to take things day-by-day and not make too many drastic moves.

“I think we need to go away from trying to interpret the president and lending an understanding that things are just going to happen the way he wants them to happen. As the market, our job is going to be to remain calm… I know that’s easier said than done. But if you get lost in interpretation mode, I feel that we’re going to get away from the point,” Castillo said.

With a pause now placed on U.S. tariffs against Canada, the conversation around the issue may take on a different tone in Canadian agriculture. But it is a conversation which will continue as the industry attempts to navigate the future of its trade relationship with the U.S.

The post Tariffs, trade dominate discussion at Canadian Crops Convention appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

During the Alberta Federation of Agriculture annual general meeting Mar. 3, Canadian Federation of Agriculture executive director Scott Ross said the CFA has been working for months on a plan to help support the industry and producers around the country, focusing on three main points.

“Rather than focusing on reacting to every single announcement that comes out of the Trump administration and trying to monitor all the different scenarios that could evolve, which are quite complex, we’ve really just focused on engaging members on three areas,” Ross said.

They included:

• If Canada is going to respond with tariffs, what are the areas that we need to be avoiding and what is the rationale that we need to ensure we are not putting tariffs on those areas?
• What are some of the areas where we may need to have exemptions to allow certain products to come in tariff free?
• What are the immediate mitigation needs our members are going to have when tariffs come into place?

Ross said in his and other CFA leaders’ discussions with producers, government and experts across the country, they have heard “loud and clear that the hurt will be fairly widespread.”

Producers will need government support

Producers staring down that hurt will need support from their provincial and federal governments, Ross said.

“Some of the key areas we really have focused on and heard from our members as needs that are going to come are things like loan guarantees and liquidity support as well as increased opportunities in market access and looking at where new markets are available,” he said.

“Another key one, of course, is looking at our business risk management programs and what sort of modifications and amendments we can make there. So we’ve put forward a number of ideas, everything from raising the payment limit under AgriStability to the compensation rate, recognizing that there could be widespread impacts here.”

National unity a silver lining

Ross said one surprising result of the U.S. tariff circus that has dominated headlines and boardrooms for months has been the unity it has sparked across the country.

“It sounds cynical to talk about it in this way, but I was attending the prime minister’s summit that was held in Toronto, and the most striking thing that came out of there is the level of national unity this entire situation has created,” he said.

“There are going to be opportunities, I think, in the short-term and medium-term to do things across the federal and provincial governments that might not have been possible in a normal situation.

“It’s something we’re also looking at, therefore, in terms of what are the significant opportunities that we should be addressing to advance our competitiveness and our resilience, recognizing that geopolitical issues continue to arise and have impacts on our sectors. We need to find ways to diversify our markets and, at the same time, strengthen our trade-enabling infrastructure so that we can continue to move product reliably to markets we identify as opportunities.”

The post CFA tariff preparation focused on tariff exemptions, producer needs appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

“Today’s imposition of tariffs on Canadian goods entering the U.S. will do nothing but harm farmers and consumers on both sides of the border,” said KAP president Jill Verwey.

“We oppose these trade actions that impede the free flow of goods between our two nations in the strongest of terms.”

The tariffs threaten a significant portion of Manitoba’s agri-food exports, which totalled $9.28 billion in 2024, with 46 per cent destined for the U.S.

Key exports such as canola, pork, potatoes and oats are now subject to the hefty tariff, potentially disrupting established trade flows.

“Manitoba farmers produce world-class agricultural products, and our trading partners in the U.S. know this, despite the actions their federal government are taking that will disrupt their ability to access Manitoba products at an affordable price,” stated Colin Hornby, KAP general manager.

KAP warns that the tariffs will not only increase costs for Manitoba farmers and jeopardize their operations but also drive up food prices for American consumers.

“These tariffs will not only add costs and threaten Manitoba farmers’ ability to operate, but will impact the livelihoods and purchasing power of countless individuals and businesses on both sides of the border, resulting in increased food costs for U.S. consumers,” Hornby said.

The organization pointed out the irony of the tariffs, given the long-standing economic prosperity enjoyed by North America through free trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement.

“Canada and the U.S. have a long, prosperous and mutually beneficial trading relationship that should continue uninterrupted for the benefit of North America’s prosperity,” Verwey said.

In response to the tariffs, KAP has developed a series of recommendations for the provincial and federal governments to mitigate the impact on Manitoba farmers:

Provincial government

• Expediting permitting processes for value-added production.

• Collaborating with other Prairie provinces to leverage shared resources.

• Removing the PST on fuel for trucking agricultural products.

Federal government

• Increasing investments in local demand and value-added capacity.

• Expanding global market diversification efforts.

• Improving business risk management programs such as AgriStability.

• Ensuring tariff revenue is distributed appropriately.

• Providing farmers with access to capital through existing programs and increasing interest-free limits.

“KAP has worked closely with our individual farmer and commodity group members, exporters, transportation sector, trade experts, grain handlers and crop input companies to understand the full scope of tariff impacts on Manitoba agriculture,” Hornby said.

The post KAP looks for support for Manitoba producers in wake of tariffs appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.

The Grain Growers of Canada is now urging the Canadian government to take immediate action to eliminate the tariffs, highlighting the potential for widespread market instability, increased financial burdens on Canadian crop producers and increased food costs for American consumers.

The newly implemented tariffs threaten a vital trade relationship, with Canada exporting more than $17 billion worth of grain and grain products to the U.S. annually.

Kyle Larkin, executive director of GGC, expressed deep concern.

“Tariffs of this magnitude will put family-run grain farms at risk by introducing widespread market uncertainty,” he said.

Canada, which exports more than 70 per cent of its grain production globally, relies heavily on international markets. The tariffs are expected to drive down farmgate prices for key crops such as wheat, canola, oats, barley, and pulses, making it increasingly difficult for farmers to remain financially viable.

“As price takers, grain farmers are at the whim of the global markets that we export to,” said Tara Sawyer, chair of GGC and an Alberta grain farmer.

“Margins are already razor thin, and an added financial burden like this could put the future of many family farms in jeopardy.”

Added Larkin: “Canadian family run grain farms are already facing death by a thousand cuts through increased input costs, regulatory burdens and taxation.…

“Uncertainty with our largest trading partner for grain and grain products, on top of ongoing instability with our second-largest trading partner, China, could push many family farms to the brink.”

GGC argues that the tariffs will negatively impact American consumers.

“A 25 per cent tariff on Canadian grain and grain products is in effect a 25 per cent tax on American consumers who purchase groceries every day,” said Larkin.

He predicted price increases for a range of everyday products, including bread, pasta, beer, oatmeal and canola oil, which will exacerbate the current affordability crisis.

The post Grain Growers of Canada react to U.S. tariffs appeared first on Manitoba Co-operator.